AI-driven audit workflow - expert-reviewed findings

AI-Driven Blockchain Security Reviews & Audits

We help Web3 teams review smart contracts, protocols, chains, rollups, bridges, RPC nodes, validators, sequencers, and blockchain infrastructure. AI accelerates scope mapping, attack-surface inventory, tool orchestration, risk triage, and reporting support while expert reviewers validate findings and recommendations.

Request Audit Scope View Methodology

audit workflow preview

audit map-scope --contracts --protocol-docs --launch-plan

Review coverage for Web3 launch risk

Smart Contracts

L1 / L2 Architecture

Rollups

RPC / Nodes

Validators / Sequencers

Bridges

Launch Readiness

// METHODOLOGY

AI-driven workflow.
Expert-led review.

AI accelerates the workflow; expert review remains responsible for final severity, remediation guidance, and client-facing findings.

Scope Mapping

Map contracts, roles, deployment scripts, protocol docs, tests, launch dates, and review priorities into a scoped audit plan.

Attack-Surface Inventory

Identify assets, trust assumptions, admin paths, price dependencies, upgrade controls, and high-impact state transitions.

Tool Orchestration

Queue static analysis, dependency checks, invariant candidates, test review, and pattern matching as inputs for expert validation.

Manual Review

Review protocol logic, access control, accounting paths, upgradeability, oracle assumptions, and failure modes with security judgment.

Risk Triage

Assign severity from impact plus likelihood, including affected assets, exploitability, privilege requirements, and operational consequence.

Report & Retest Support

Produce findings, remediation guidance, assumptions, and retest notes for fixes reviewed in the agreed revision.

AI drives scope mapping, attack-surface inventory, tool orchestration, risk triage, and reporting support. It does not replace expert review or prove complete vulnerability discovery.

// SERVICES

Security reviews for Web3 launch risk.

Focused review tracks for teams preparing a mainnet launch, upgrade, integration, or remediation cycle.

Smart Contract Audit

Review Solidity/EVM contracts, access control, upgrade paths, accounting logic, oracle assumptions, and high-impact state transitions.

Protocol Risk Review

Map protocol architecture, trust assumptions, roles, admin controls, dependency risk, economic assumptions, and cross-contract interactions.

Blockchain & Rollup Security Review

Review chain architecture, node/RPC exposure, validator or sequencer assumptions, bridge messaging, rollup upgrade governance, signing infrastructure, and emergency controls.

Launch Readiness Review

Assess deployment controls, upgrade/admin-key paths, monitoring handoff, incident preparation, and known-risk signoff before launch or upgrade.

// DELIVERABLES

Actionable reports.
Clear remediation path.

Each review is scoped around what was provided, what was examined, what was found, and what should happen next.

Executive summary

Plain-language risk overview for founders, protocol leads, and security owners.

Scope and assumptions

Reviewed contracts, commit references, dependencies, deployment assumptions, and excluded areas.

Finding table

Issue title, affected component, severity, status, and recommended next action.

Severity rationale

Impact, likelihood, affected assets, exploitability, and operational consequence for each finding.

Reproduction notes where applicable

Steps, reasoning, or proof detail sufficient for the engineering team to validate the issue.

Remediation guidance

Concrete fix direction, design alternatives, and follow-up questions for the implementation team.

Retest memo

Fix verification status for reviewed findings in the specified revision.

Launch readiness checklist

Deployment, monitoring, admin control, and known-risk items to review before launch.

Severity model

Level	How it is used
Critical	Direct path to severe loss, protocol takeover, or irreversible asset impact.
High	Material exploit path with strong impact or realistic preconditions.
Medium	Meaningful risk requiring fixes, additional checks, or design clarification.
Low	Limited impact, hard preconditions, or defense-in-depth improvement.
Informational	Documentation, clarity, hardening, or operational recommendation.

Severity is assigned from impact plus likelihood, including affected assets, exploitability, privilege requirements, and operational consequence.

RETEST STATES

FixedFinding appears addressed

Partially fixedPatch reduces but does not close risk

OpenFinding remains unresolved

Risk acceptedTeam accepts residual risk

Retest validates whether reported findings appear addressed in the reviewed revision; it is not a new full audit unless separately scoped.

// READINESS

Before launch,
make risk explicit.

Launch readiness connects audit findings to deployment controls, operating assumptions, and known-risk decisions.

Deployment controls

Review deployment process, release authority, script assumptions, and final commit references.

Upgrade and admin-key review

Inspect privileged roles, timelocks, multisig assumptions, emergency paths, and ownership transfer risk.

Node, RPC, and validator exposure

Review RPC exposure, node access paths, validator or sequencer trust assumptions, relayer roles, and infrastructure blast radius.

Bridge and cross-chain assumptions

Document message validation, relayer trust, finality assumptions, bridge governance, and emergency stop paths.

Oracle and dependency assumptions

Document price feeds, external integrations, library dependencies, and failure conditions.

Pause and guardian paths

Review emergency controls, governance handoff, and conditions for using privileged interventions.

Monitoring and incident handoff

Identify events, alerts, dashboards, and escalation owners needed after deployment.

Known-risk signoff

Track accepted findings, unresolved assumptions, and decision owners before launch.

Launch readiness is a risk-based review and recommendation, not a certification, warranty, or insurance product.